The most serious defect in the evolutionary theory is the absence of transitional fossils.
If life has always been in a continual stream of transmutation from one form to the other,as evolutionists insist,then we should certainly expect to find as many fossils of the intermediate stages between different forms as of the distinct kinds themselves.Yet no fossils have been found that can be considered transitional between the major groups of Phyla.
From the very beginning these organisms were just as clearly and distinctly set apart from each other as they are today.
Except, they aren’t; go look at them.
Instead of finding a record of fine gradations preserved in the fossil record,we invariably find large gaps.
Gaps? If you have a time line, and you find something from a specific point in it, exactly where evolutionary models predict it to be, mind you, it splits it in two. You can extrapolate between these and make predictions as to what kind of fossils you will find at what points in time to fill said “gap” and where you will find them. This was precisely what was done with Tiktaalik and Acanthostega as well as numerous hominoid fossils.
This fact is absolutely fatal to the general theory of evolution.
Did you sleep during biology class?
Consider well these immense Gaps:
1. The imagined jump from dead matter to living protozoans is a transition of truly fanciful dimension,one of pure conjecture which overlooks the works of Redi,Spallanzi, and Pasteur,who disproved spontaneous generation.
Because molecules fossilize SO well… They disproved spontaneous generation, NOT modern abiogenesis. The modern field of abiogenesis research knows that. It’s not excluding that information. Bacteria don’t magically appear. Self-replicating systems can appear.
2.There is a gigantic gap between one-celled microorganisms and the high complexity and variety of the metazoan invertebrates.
Viruses make neat transitional forms for this, as do archaea. Cyanobacteria are neat little bacteria which look an aweful lot like chloroplasts.
3.The evolutionary transition between invertebrates and vertebrates is completely missing. This is absolutely incredible since evolutionists propose 100 million years of developmental time between the two,which would have involved billions of transitional forms,Yet,not one has ever been found.
4.The evolutionary advance from fishes to Amphibians is totally nonexistent.The timeline allegedly took millions of years….(30 million)…and yet no one has been able to produce even one fishibian.
5.There are no connecting links between and the altogether different reptiles.Seymouria has been offered as such a link,but it allegedly occurs in the geologic column some 20 million years after other reptiles had already appeared.
6.There are no transitional forms between mammals and reptiles.
Do I really need to demonstrate this? Will you just take my word that there are lots of them? I do? Just read about what a “synapsid” is…
7.There is no connecting evolutionary link between reptiles and birds.Archaeopteryx was once highly acclaimed as such a link but has since been acknowledged by Paleontologists to have been a true bird.
8.There are no intermediate fossils leading up to man from an apelike ancestor.Fossil hominids and hominoids cited by evolutionists are actually either fossils of ape or a man or neither.There is no valid Scientific evidence to suggest that they are fossils of animals intermediate between men and apes.